The trouble with categories for books? Like categories of humans, as soon as you slap a label on a book, you limit it. People tend to avoid it unless it’s a genre they read. Of course many books, like people, don’t fit neatly into a pigeonhole. A major category, and one that some readers are uncomfortable with, even avoid, is literary. They assume the language will challenge them, the plot won’t flow.
Like this… and have looked at this book few times. Think I heard an npr commentary re sf always showing a negative future. Scientists see more positive possible futures and wonder why those scenarios don’t make it in fiction. ..
Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
I think the negative is due to several reasons. First, we find it difficult to envision a future in which we don’t exist, which colors the whole picture. Second, with all that’s going on in the world today (terrorists, mass murderers, constant threats of war, enslavement of women in the third world, extinction of species), simply maintaining equilibrium becomes a challenge. Third–you gotta have challenges and dangers in novels. What better way to accomplish this than with social issues?
Pingback: Why do you read thrilling adventures and wild stories? | Karavansara